Tonight I finished the first draft of my latest novel. It came in just short of 45,000 words (and after edits will probably land at closer to 46,000), which I think is about right for an upper-middle grade novel. In a macro sense, I think finishing it now really shows how much better I’m getting as a writer.
First novel: Took 24 months, had some good scenes but frankly, was terrible overall.
Second novel: Took 18 months, both I and my writing group, the Writers of Chantilly, judged it to be pretty good, I think, but no interest from agents.
Third novel (this one): 14 months, at least for the first draft. It may take another 4-6 weeks for revisions, but honestly, I don’t think it needs that much more work. For one thing, I’ve already read the first two-thirds or so to the group, and I always do my best to get each chapter in good shape before I read it to them. So, I need to give the final one-third a hard revision, make a few adjustments to the early chapters to account for unforeseen developments later in the book, and give it all a final go-over with 400-grit sandpaper. Final time elapsed will probably be 16 months.
So, I’m getting faster, more confident, and hopefully better. I have a good feeling about this book’s prospects for interest from agents, publishers, etc. I think the hook for this one is clear, the characters well-drawn, the pace is quick. I just hope the professional publishing world agrees!
An essay, or perhaps a sermon, about writing.
Read MoreSo I was on vacation last week, and the week before that was just crazy, and maybe the week before that I’d been kind of lazy. But for whatever reason, I hadn’t written in my WiP for three weeks. I was really dreading getting back to it, too. After you haven’t worked on your project for a while, it’s hard to get back into the groove.
But on Monday I went to my Writers of Chantilly meeting, and I came away charged. Ready to return to my work. Maybe it was the positive comments I received on my latest chapter. Maybe it was being around other writers excited about their work. Maybe it was simply thinking about the writing process. Whatever the reason, last night I sat down at the computer and made a number of changes to my novel I’ve been meaning to for a while, and got in some actual writing as well. All in all, a solid night, and I’m still ready to write again tonight.
So here’s another reason we could add to the list of why you, a writer, should definitely be in a writer’s group: getting back on track when you’ve lost your way.
So after a week-long vacation, and several extremely busy days after getting back, I’ve finally returned to writing on a daily basis this week. The first couple days were tough, but now the words are flowing. I’m struck again, as I have been in the past, how important it is to write every day.
For the novelist, it’s critical. You simply can’t get any momentum going if you take days off between writing sessions. When you take a couple days off, you have to read over what you’ve previously written, re-calibrate, take a few paragraphs to warm up, and only then does real writing come out, maybe. You’ll never finish that way. But write daily, and each new session flows beautifully. Your mind has been working on the problems of the previous session and you start exactly where you left off previously, with new ideas and energy.
I’m not the only one who thinks this. Stephen King’s a big believer in writing every day. Raymond Chandler prescribed four hours a day for writing, and even if he couldn’t think of anything, he forced himself to sit in the chair and look out the window.
That’s novelists. Surely other types of writers are different? Well, maybe, but I’m not so sure. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe started writing a poem every day when he was a teen-ager, and continued the habit throughout his life. It worked out pretty well for him. I bet most successful writers make it to the writing desk daily, or nearly so.
If you miss a day here and there, it’s probably unavoidable. Don’t sweat it. But try to write at least six days every week. Avoid missing more than one day in a row. That’s how you keep your brain bubbling. Here’s a secret: Writing is not the product of inspiration; inspiration is the product of writing.
Keeping to the theme of the last post, today I’m going to list some words you should leave out of your writing. After you finish a piece, go through with the word search function and see how many of the following you can remove.
Note: I will revisit this post from time to time as I think of new ones (i.e., come across them in my own writing).
very–A strange word in that it does the opposite of what you think it does. You think it amplifies or emphasizes, but it actually diminishes.
Dr. Brown’s new car was very shiny, very sleek, and very fast.
Dr. Brown’s new car was shiny, sleek, and fast.
See? All those verys slow the reader down. Take the advice of Depeche Mode: Very is very unnecessary; it can only do harm.
begin to, start to–Normally, people don’t begin to do something, they just do it.
The wolf approached me, drooling and snarling. I turned and started to run ran.
just–This is a problematic one for me. Nothing wrong with the word, I just seem to use it once or twice a page when I write. I think I just don’t realize I’m putting it in. I just have to use the word search when I’m done and I can eliminate three-quarters of the justs.
saw, look–Nothing wrong with these words. They’re good, solid words that will appear many times in your writing. However, they can be a little boring. See if you can’t replace a few of them with eye, focus, gape, gaze, glance, observe, ogle, regard, scan, spy, view, watch, etc. Don’t take this too far though–the goal isn’t to bedeck your manuscript like a royal crown! A little goes a long way.
actually–Thanks to Dana for a link to a similar post! From that I got the idea for actually. I checked my own WiP with this and found 8 actuallys. Four could be crossed out without changing or harming the sentences; actually, improving them. Two were in dialogue and could stay; two more were truly transitions between sentences. Whether because she hadn’t heard or was ignoring him, Sully wasn’t sure. Actually, it was all as new to him as to her.
Now that I’m working on my third novel, I find that I’m willing to leave out a lot more stuff.
How did a character get from one place to another? Who cares? We know they have legs, they probably walked.
How did a character learn a piece of information? Unless it’s a secret, it’s probably general knowledge in their locale, or maybe they heard it through the rumor mill.
How did two characters become romantically involved? Sometimes it’s important to show this, other times it’s enough to show they’re interested in each other. Then, when we rejoin them at a later time, it’s natrual they should be a couple.
A lot of this boils down to this: Don’t belabor the obvious. Don’t bore the reader with details she can easily assume.
On the other hand, I’ve read books where some important piece of business takes place off stage while the narrative follows some character at a dinner party or driving a car or something. (This especially seems to afflict the soap opera strips on the newspaper comics page, where Judge Parker or Mary Worth are always arriving on the scene right after something interesting happened.)
Here are some general rules on when to leave it out or include a scene:
Leave in
– Important character development
– Fights, arguments, conflict
– Action that moves the story along
– Unusual, weird, don’t see that every day
Leave out
– Spatial movement. Just go to the scene where something is happening, and we’ll assume the characters know how to get there. The exception, of course, is where the travel itself is important to the plot.
– Logically necessary but obvious developments. It may be important that a character, say, has a fully-stocked refrigerator, but you don’t need to show us the shopping trip.
– Sex. For some reason sex is usually pretty boring to read in books. Maybe because it interrupts the plot action? Just give us a hint that it’s about to happen, and then move on.
– Boring things. Even if they’re necessary for the plot, try to find a way to cut a scene that feels boring. Maybe have the next scene start right after the necessary but boring scene took place, and have characters mention that it happened.
Here’s a rule of thumb: If it bores you when you’re writing it, it will bore the reader when she reads it.